Karoly lev online dating chuck wicks and julianne hough dating
: Anyone with an elementary knowledge of the Internet knows that links can break at any time for various reasons. on "Climate forcing by the volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo" (PDF) (Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 32, Number 20, October 2005)- David H. Knox Global warming and the mining of oceanic methane hydrate (Topics in Catalysis, Volume 32, Issue 3-4, pp. 9-13, 2006)- Milan Radovanovic, Mirceta Vemic, Ivan Popovic Methodology and Results of Calculating Central California Surface Temperature Trends: Evidence of Human-Induced Climate Change? " (Journal of Climate, Volume 20, Issue 7, September 2007)- John R. 603-607, July 2006)- Jack Barrett, David Bellamy, Heinz Hug On global forces of nature driving the Earth's climate. Unfortunately certain journals are apparently unable to hire competent web masters who know how to properly migrate URLs when reorganizing their websites - this problem is out of our control. 95-99, March 2005)- Chung-Chieng Lai, David Dietrich, Malcolm Bowman The Interaction of Climate Change and the Carbon Dioxide Cycle (Energy & Environment, Volume 16, Number 2, pp. Courtney, Dick Thoenes Discussions on Climate Change as Presented in Nature, 2004 (Energy & Environment, Volume 16, Number 2, pp. Njau Some examples of negative feedback in the Earth climate system (PDF) (Central European Journal of Physics, Volume 3, Number 2, June 2005)- Olavi Karner The Global Warming Debate: A Review of the State of Science (PDF) (Pure and Applied Geophysics, Volume 162, Issue 8-9, pp. (PDF) (Journal of Climate, Volume 19, Issue 4, February 2006)- John R. The purpose of the list is to show that peer-reviewed papers exist that support skeptic arguments and to be used as a bibliographic resource to locate these papers. Aeschbach-Hertig rebuttal of "On global forces of nature driving the Earth’s climate. : This is absolutely false, as the list does not discriminate between competing skeptical viewpoints and the purpose of the list is clearly stated, "To provide a bibliographic resource for peer-reviewed papers that support skeptic arguments against ACC/AGW or Alarmism and to prove that these papers exist contrary to claims otherwise." Using this logic the IPCC reports are "cherry picked" because they failed to included most of these papers. Please read the following introductory notes for more detailed information.Disclaimer: Even though the most prolific authors on the list are skeptics, the inclusion of a paper in this list does not imply a specific personal position to any of the authors.: The IPCC states that, "climate sensitivity is likely (66%) to be in the range 2°C to 4.5°C, with a best estimate value of about 3°C." Thus, climate sensitivity estimates where the mean does not exceed 2°C (low end of the IPCC range) or the high end of the range does not exceed 3°C (the IPCC mean) are considered to support skeptical arguments for a low climate sensitivity. : The list is a bibliographic resource not a scientific argument.
This list will be updated and corrected as necessary. Criteria for Removal: Papers will only be removed if it is determined by the editor that they have not properly met the criteria for inclusion or have been retracted by the journal.
"A tour de force list of scientific papers..." - Robert M. Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) or Dangerous Anthropogenic Global Warming (DAGW)].
Environmental Scientist "Wow, the list is pretty impressive ... General Antarctica Arctic Climate Sensitivity Clouds Coral Reefs Deaths Disease Ecological Glaciers Greenland Gulf Stream Hockey Stick Medieval Warm Period Roman Warm Period Ocean Acidification Permafrost Polar Bears Sea Level Species Extinctions Preface: The following papers support skeptic arguments against Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC), Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) or Alarmism [e.g.
Supplemental papers include (but are not limited to): Addendums, Comments, Corrections, Discussions, Erratum, Rebuttals, Rejoinders, Replies, Responses, Supplemental Material, Updates and Submitted papers. When a significant new number of peer-reviewed papers is added the list title will be updated with the new larger number. Any known published correction will be included on the list following the original paper to show that these did not affect the author's original conclusions.
The list intentionally includes an additional 10 peer-reviewed papers as a margin of error at all times, which gradually increases between updates. Formatting: All papers are cited as: "Paper Name, Journal Name, Volume, Issue or Number, Pages, Date and Authors". Presidential Candidate (2004) "There was a massive study of every scientific article in a peer reviewed article written on global warming in the last ten years.